BOCC: A Political Vignette
Who Will Run the Republican Central
Committee? Will the Voters Get
More Manageable Precincts?

ommentary
There is a problem in the Custer County Republican Central Com-mittee (CCRCC): It is the balance between the number of elected officials on the committee and the number of citizens on the committee. Before the last two election cycles, the elected official members and a few of their cronies had the majority. Now, the citizens on the CCRCC, along with some brand new elected officials have a slim majority. But with having only three county precincts, the balance between the Old Guard elected officials and the citizens could switch at any time. There is a movement to permanently fix this problem and have the Republican party members of the county run the CCRCC and the latest episode of this struggle
occurred last week.
The other problem in the county is that the precincts are huge for such a small county and are impossible to manage properly by the political parties. Smaller precincts would allow for a much more engaged citizenry and a more robust and knowledgeable voter base.
So how did we get here?
Six of the ten party members on the Republican Committee are the Precinct Committee Persons (“PCP’s”). Each county precinct has two PCP’s. Custer County
has only three precincts so that is only six on the CCRCC.
In the vast majority of counties in Colorado, the civilians easily control the central committees as they have a multitude of precincts. Precinct sizes can vary, from just two people (in one very weird case in Colorado) to 2,000. Custer County’s precincts are huge, the number of 1,400 per precinct is often
stated. Counties similar to Custer County have MUCH smaller precinct sizes.
Smaller precincts are much easier to manage for the political parties than large ones. The smaller make it easier for the parties to interact and engage with the voters, which in turn encourages voter participation. This is a good thing.
There has been a movement over the last few years by some members of the CCRCC and other concerned citizens to have the county create more precincts to help the voter management and engagement process, but also to ensure that the CCRCC is run BY THE PEOPLE rather than by a clique of elected politicians.
This has been met with heavy resistance from the established elected Republicans on the committee as they don’t want to lose power.(However, two new elected county officials, who believe the citizens should run the committee have been recently elected which has switched the balance ever so slightly to the people.)
The latest effort by the people to have the county create new, more manageable precincts occurred last week at the January 10, 2024 Custer County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) meeting where citizen Jack Canterbury (who is also the CCRCC Chair but he was representing himself on this subject) made a proposal to the BOCC on having the county move from three precincts to nine.
Jack’s presentation quoted multiple Colorado statutes concerning the creation and maintenance of precincts. On the surface, it looks like the BOCC has the authority to create new precincts, however, there are some statements in the statutes that might throw some doubt on the BOCC’s authority, but they are in the minority. (However, see Joy Anderson’s scholarly research into the issue at the end of this article.)
So why does the statutory conflict matter? If the BOCC has the power, it appears that BOCC members Bill Canda and Lucas Epp would favor the expansion while member Kevin Day is against it. (Despite Day’s claim at the meeting that he was “open” to it, his actions state otherwise. On the County Clerk side, Clerk Kelly Camper it is not clear if she is in favor of it but she did say was also open to it.)
At the meeting, after Canterbury’s presentation, Day read from a memo he got from the County Attorney, Dan Slater, (who is a big time state Democrat political big wig) stating that although the statutes are a bit murky, in his opinion, the County Clerk is the boss on this and it is solely up to her to make the call. His main argument was that the wording that says the Clerk is the boss is “specific” and, Slater alleges, that the wording saying the BOCC is in charge is
more “general.” (Based on Canterbury’s statute quotes, it is for sure not certain that the Clerk in charge.
Canterbury’s statute word-
ing is specific, too.) Day had asked for Slater’s opinion before the meeting. Slater was even called into the meeting to defend his conclusion.
Now, precinct structure today is solely a political item. With there being NO actual election voting activity taking place at the precincts (it is all done now via mail and at the courthouse.) There is a little
extra work required by the County Clerk in setting up precincts and syncing with voter records. There is NO argument that extra precincts would result in any substantial work increase for the county (once the precincts are set up).
So why would anybody object to having much smaller, normal sized precincts that would allow the political parties to
work more efficiently? The extra work is AT THE
PARTY LEVEL and NOT at the county level.
The ONLY reason why some of our elected officials want to have only three precincts is that it is the ONLY way that they have a chance at controlling the CCRCC and prevent The People from running our local political party. Small precincts are STRONGER precincts. Why would an elected Republican official not want a stronger party? Folks, as usual, it is all
about power and control. The Old Republican Guard
here in Custer (and the state) is scared of the new, MAGA style, power of the people, voters that are demanding that the PEOPLE run our local political party and not career political operatives. (Note, Fremont County, has TWENTY precincts. Canterbury did a big review of other counties similar or a larger than Custer and they all had many more precincts than us.)
The process to add new precincts takes many months. Mrs. Camper noted in the meeting that we are having four elections in 2024 in Happy Valley and it would be a big problem for her to do the work this year to have new precincts. Fair enough.
The meeting ended with the understanding that Canterbury would form a “bipartisan” committee to study this further and make another presentation at a later date. This committee idea originated with Day. It is a joke and possibly an attempt to side-track the whole deal as the local dems will be totally be against it. (Why make our adversaries stronger?) And the unaffiliated shouldn’t even be involved in it.
Perhaps the best course forward is for Canterbury to have the CCRCC officially endorse the nine precinct concept and then present it to the BOCC and the County Clerk. At that presentation, ask them to vote yes or no on it. (The three BOCC members and the County Clerk.) No need to actually create the precincts this year, but get the commitment to do it next year. We need to know where they stand. Are they for the citizens or are they for themselves?
Bottom line: It doesn’t matter who is in charge of adding precincts, it is the RIGHT THING to do
for the voters of Custer County. The more the
citizens are involved in the political process, the better off the county is. BOCC and County Clerk: Do what is right, fix our precincts and help our voters. For once put the county ahead of petty politics.
(Local Citizen, Joy Anderson, has written a memo on who has the power in Colorado to control the creation of new precincts. The memo looks rock solid: it is the BOCC. See page 22 to read it.  Download the pdf here:   https://sangredecristosentinel.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/011924-pg-22.pdf )